![From Gas Station to Google with Self-Taught Cloud Engineer Rishab Kumar [Podcast #158]](https://cdn.hashnode.com/res/hashnode/image/upload/v1738339892695/6b303b0a-c99c-4074-b4bd-104f98252c0c.png?#)
Top 9 Amazon Textract alternatives for data extraction
Explore top Amazon Textract alternatives for efficient document processing. Compare features, pricing, and user ratings to find the best fit for your needs.
Amazon Textract is AWS's machine learning service that reads and processes documents automatically. It does more than just turn images into text like basic OCR tools. You can use it to pull data from forms and tables, process both typed and handwritten text, work with PDFs and scanned images, and handle multilingual document processing. It even comes with ready-to-use tools for specific documents like invoices, IDs, and lending paperwork.
Our analysis of real-world implementations revealed Textract's clear strengths and limitations. It excels at processing structured financial documents and forms within the AWS ecosystem. The pricing starts at $1.50 per 1,000 pages for basic text extraction, scaling up for specialized document types like invoices or lending documents. On the other hand, he platform falls short when it comes to:
2. Costs that scale poorly for large volumes
3. Complex document layouts and non-standard formatting
4. Table extraction with advanced formatting
5. Setup requiring AWS expertise and ongoing maintenance
Let's look at the top Textract alternatives to help you pick the right tool for your document processing needs.
A quick comparison of Amazon Textract alternatives
| Sr No. | Product | Main feature | G2 rating | Free trial | Pricing | Total score* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon Textract | AWS-native document processing | 4.4/5 | No | Pay-as-you-go ($1.50 per 1,000 pages) | 43.4 |
| 2 | Nanonets | End-to-end automation with 98% accuracy | 4.8/5 | Yes (500 pages) | Pay-as-you-go, First 500 pages free | 46.5 |
| 3 | Rossum | Cognitive data capture | 4.4/5 | No | Custom pricing | 43.8 |
| 4 | Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Yes | Starts at $39/month | 44.0 |
| 5 | Azure DI | Enterprise integration | 4.5/5 | Yes | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
| 6 | Google Cloud Document AI | ML-powered processing | 4.2/5 | Yes | Pay-as-you-go | 43.2 |
| 7 | ABBYY FlexiCapture | Advanced OCR capabilities | 4.1/5 | No | Starts at $4,150 (one-time) | 44.3 |
| 8 | Tungsten Capture | High-volume document scanning | 4.3/5 | Yes | Custom pricing | 43.0 |
| 9 | Laserfiche | Enterprise content management | 4.7/5 | Yes | Starts at $50/user/year | 43.9 |
| 10 | Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Custom pricing | 46.3 |
(*Refer to scoring methodology at the bottom)
Now, let's examine each alternative in detail to understand their specific strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases. We'll analyze how they compare to Textract and help you determine which solution best fits your document processing needs.
1. Nanonets
Nanonets is an AI based document processing platform that goes beyond basic OCR to provide end-to-end automation. Unlike Textract's template-based approach, we use deep learning to understand document context and adapt to new layouts automatically. Our platform combines OCR, natural language processing, and machine learning to handle everything from data extraction to workflow automation.
